The Making of Arguments

This work targets students and educators, aiming to enhance the skills necessary for constructing effective arguments and engaging in productive discourse, regardless of an individual's level of expertise in debate or law. The opening of the book establishes its purpose of equipping students with the foundational skills needed to create influential arguments. Gardiner emphasizes the necessity of understanding both the logic and emotional appeal of arguments while acknowledging the variety of perspectives on any issue. He discusses the importance of tailoring arguments to specific audiences and highlights the differences between mere disputes and persuasive arguments. Through detailed explanations, he intends to offer practical guidance for students to navigate complex questions and hone their argumentative skills in academic and real-world contexts.

In the third place, it is desirable that the proposition should be so framed as to throw the burden of proof on the affirmative. Unless the side which opens the debate has something definite to propose, the debate must open more or less lamely, for it is hard to attack or oppose something which is going to be set forth after you have finished talking. Here, however, as in the case of written arguments, it must be remembered that burden of proof is a vague and slippery term; "he who asserts must prove" is a maxim that in debate applies to the larger issues only, and the average audience will give themselves little trouble about the finer applications of it. If you are proposing a change in present conditions, and the present conditions are not very bad, they will expect you to show why there should be a change, and to make clear that the change you proposewillwork an improvement. It is onlywhen conditions have become intolerable that an audience thinks first of the remedy. In the ordinary school or college, for example, there is little reason in current conditions for introducing the honor system in examinations: in such a case the burden of proof on the affirmative would be obvious, If, however, as occasionally happens, there has been an epidemic of dishonesty in written work, then the authorities of the school and the parents would want to know why there should not be a change. But it would both bore and confuse an audience to explain to them at length the theory of the shifting of the burden of proof; and the chances are that they would say, "Why doesn't he prove his point, and not spend his time beating about the bush?"